[Plura-list] EU v FB (vg!); AOC wins; Vegas casino workers beg for their lives; You are wrong about CDA 230

[Cory Doctorow]

Today's links

* EU v FB (vg!): Facebook must stop tracking users around the web.

* AOC wins: Her opponent was a villain out of central casting.

* Vegas casino workers beg for their lives: "The market has decided."

* You are wrong about CDA 230: A comprehensive and complete FAQ about
the internet's worst-understood, most-maligned law.

* This day in history: 2005, 2010, 2015, 2019

* Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming appearances, current writing
projects, current reading

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ EU v FB (vg!)

Like all walled gardens, Facebook doesn't have users, it has hostages -
but it also has prey. Even if you don't have a FB account (and
especially if you do), FB tracks you across the web and through your
apps, thanks to Like buttons, FB pixels and other trackers.

A German court just ordered them to knock that shit off.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/technology/facebook-antitrust-germany.html

Last year, the German competition regulator ruled FB was breaking the
law when it collected data using non-FB websites and apps. FB appealed
to Germany's highest court, which just ruled against them.

The Federal Court of Justice ordered FB to change how it processes
user-data, and to allow people (including those without FB accounts) to
choose not to be followed around the web and through their apps.

FB has vowed to fight, though the lower court that punted the question
up to the top court is almost certain to rubberstamp the decision. FB
might take the decision to the EUCJ, Europe's top court, but that's
quite a gamble, given recent ruling from that court.

In the meantime, FB is making no changes to its illegal nonconsensual
tracking conduct, slow-walking compliance with the order until the very
last second.

You can block FB data-collection on the web with Privacy Badger, EFF's
tracker-blocker.

https://privacybadger.org/

But when it comes to keeping FB out of your pocket distraction
rectangle, you're basically fucked. Neither of the mobile OS duopolists
have given you adequate tools to keep FB from following you around, even
if you don't have the FB app.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ AOC wins

NY14 is a Democratic safe-seat, meaning whomever gets the Democratic
nomination there automatically ends up in Congress. In 2018, AOC
trounced Joe Crowley, a 10-term, banker-lovin' DINO who was thought to
be unassailable.

NY just had 2020 primaries, and AOC a primary challenge: Michelle
Caruso-Cabrera, a former registered Republican who hates Medicare and
Social Security, and whose campaign raised vast sums from private equity
looters and other garbage people.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/04/16/new-old-apples/#aoc-not-mcc

Choosing Caruso-Cabrera as their standard bearer was a spectacular act
of contempt and hubris on the part of the finance sector. Not only did
she not articulate a single policy (!), but she has a history of writing
books calling for the abolition of the Department of Labor!

Other gems from her literary oeuvre: a demand for *more* offshore
tax-havens: "Freedom and democracy are best secured when banking secrecy
and tax havens exist."

Contrast this with AOC's brilliant performance in shredding finance
industry criminals in Congress!

The finance industry truly made the primary race a referendum on
plutocracy, impunity, inequality and corruption...

...And they lost.

Badly.

https://www.axios.com/aoc-primary-challenger-michelle-caruso-cabrera-8b2ed6c1-3aaf-4fdf-ab8c-4d33b3e1b1b6.html?utm_source=twitter&utm;_medium=social&utm;_campaign=onhrs

Despite being grossly outspent and outgunned, AOC slaughtered
Caruso-Cabrera at the polls.

https://www.axios.com/aoc-primary-challenger-michelle-caruso-cabrera-8b2ed6c1-3aaf-4fdf-ab8c-4d33b3e1b1b6.html

The victory tells us two things about the current moment:

1. The time of plutocratic rule is coming to an end.

2. The plutes do *not* understand that.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ Vegas casino workers beg for their lives

Las Vegas was one of the first US cities to re-open and it was among the
most aggressive, thanks largely to its idiot mayor Carolyn Goodman, who
says businesses should make up their own protocols and the market will
decide what's adequate.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/04/23/riot-baby/#carolyn-goodman

Goodman: "I am not a private owner. That's the competition in this
country. The free enterprise and to be able to make sure that what you
offer the public meets the needs of the public."

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/22/politics/las-vegas-mayor-social-distancing-cnntv/index.html

You will never guess what happened next.

As cases rise in Nevada, casino workers are "begging" gamblers to put on
a fucking mask - reportedly only 10% are doing so.

(No language on Earth contains the phrase "As prudent as an habitual
gambler")

https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/las-vegas-casino-workers-urge-guests-to-wear-masks-as-nevada-cases-rise_n_5ef24911c5b663ecc854770f

The state Casino Board has only mandated masks for games whose tables
require players to be in close proximity, again, relying on the caution
and sound statistical reasoning of people who throw their life's savings
into pseudorandom-number generators.


_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ You are wrong about CDA 230

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is probably the
worst-understood - and most important - internet regulations, and the
confusion's only gotten worse since Trump signed a legally incoherent
executive order purporting to reform it.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/05/30/up-is-not-down/#cda230

Under CDA 230, responsibility for bad speech acts (libel, obscenity,
etc) rests on the speaker, not the host. FB isn't legally responsible
for what its users post, but it IS responsible for what its employees
and execs post.

A bunch of well-meaning people who hate things that I hate - racism,
harassment, etc - have been calling for CDA 230 reform to fight this. I
think they're well-intentioned, but dangerously wrong.

Big Tech is terrible at moderation. Forcing them to do more will not
make them better at it. Instead, we'll get more kangaroo courts,
powerful people who hire moderation-policy experts can silence their
victims while harassing them with impunity.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/06/17/on-face-interaction/#content-moderation-at-scale

Right on cue, far-right assholes have weaponized the right's
victim-complex to join forces with progressives who want to dismantle
CDA 230, in a bid to force a "fairness doctrine" on tech companies that
will favor whoever has the most resources.

I get exhausted just thinking about this stupid, stupid stuff. But one
person who's been absolutely rock-solid in handing out fact-based
rebuttals to it is Mike Masnick.

Now, he's posted "Hello! You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong
About Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act," which breaks down
every one of the bad arguments made by CDA 230 opponents.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act.shtml

(It's a riff on Ken White's canonical "Hello! You've Been Referred Here
Because You're Wrong About The First Amendment.)

https://www.popehat.com/2016/06/11/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-the-first-amendment/

Here's the myths Masnick busts:

* "Once a company like that starts moderating content, it's no longer a
platform, but a publisher"

* "Because of Section 230, websites have no incentive to moderate!"

* "Section 230 is a massive gift to big tech!"

* "A site that has political bias is not neutral, and thus loses its
Section 230 protections"

* "Section 230 requires all moderation to be in 'good faith' and this
moderation is 'biased' so you don't get 230 protections"

* "Section 230 is why there's hate speech online..."

* "Section 230 means these companies can never be sued!"

* "Section 230 is a get out of jail card for websites!"

* "Section 230 is why there's piracy online"

* "Section 230 gives websites blanket immunity!"

* "Section 230 is why big internet companies are so big!"

* "Section 230 was designed to encourage websites to be neutral common
carriers"

* "If all this stuff is actually protected by the 1st Amendment, then we
can just get rid of Section 230"

Look, I get why you might have heard someone say this stuff and assumed
they were right. Normally, reading statutes is a hard slog and we have
to rely on experts to interpret the laws for us.

But while there's a lot of caselaw around CDA 230 (Masnick's got links),
the actual statute is remarkably short, punchy and clear. You can and
should read it for yourself, *especially* if you're going to opine about
what it means.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ This day in history

#15yrsago Dianne Feinstein on the Broadcast Flag: Idiot or liar?
https://boingboing.net/2005/06/24/dianne-feinstein-on.html

#10yrago Young people, risky behavior and the net: the facts
http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/06/24/risky-behaviors-and-online-safety-a-2010-literature-review.html

#10yrsago Regwall cuts The Times's online readership in half
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/06/incipient-paywall-costing-newspaper-online-readers/

#10yrago EU secretly pushing to put kids in jail for sharing music: ACTA
leak
https://www.laquadrature.net/en/2010/06/24/leak-eu-pushes-for-criminalizing-non-commercial-usages-in-acta/

#10yrsago Canada's Heritage Minister caught covering up "radical
extremists" slur
https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2010/06/radical-extremist-comment/

#5yrsago Not just Germany: the NSA has been spying on France's leaders
since at least 1995 https://wikileaks.org/nsa-france/intercepts/

#1yrago America's super-rich write to Democratic presidential hopefuls,
demanding a wealth tax
https://medium.com/@letterforawealthtax/an-open-letter-to-the-2020-presidential-candidates-its-time-to-tax-us-more-6eb3a548b2fe

#1yrago You can't recycle your way out of climate change
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/the-highlight/2019/5/28/18629833/climate-change-2019-green-new-deal

#1yrago Lessons from Microsoft's antitrust adventure for today's Big
Tech giants
https://web.archive.org/web/20190624155908/https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Microsoft-s-missteps-offer-antitrust-lessons-for-14030092.php

#1yrago US election security: still a dumpster fire
https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/securing-our-cyber-future

#1yrago Mandatory childbirth: how the anti-abortion crusade masks
cruelty to women in the "sacralizing of fetuses"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/23/opinion/anti-abortion-history.html

#1yrago The internet has become a "low-trust society"
https://www.wired.com/story/internet-made-dupes-cynics-of-us-all/

#1yrago "PM for a day": dissident Tories plan to bring down the
government the day after Boris Johnson becomes Prime Minister
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/boris-johnson-could-be-prime-minister-for-just-one-day-as-mps-plot-no-confidence-vote-305464

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ Colophon

Today's top sources: Slashdot (https://slashdot.org/), Naked Capitalism
(https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/), Four Short Links
(https://www.oreilly.com/feed/four-short-links).

Currently writing:

* My next novel, "The Lost Cause," a post-GND novel about truth and
reconciliation. Yesterday's progress: 596 words (30792 total).

* A short story, "Making Hay," for MIT Tech Review. Yesterday's
progress: 320 words (2932 total)

Currently reading: Goliath, Matt Stoller.

Latest podcast: Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town (part 07)
https://craphound.com/podcast/2020/06/22/someone-comes-to-town-someone-leaves-town-part-07-2/

Upcoming appearances:

* In Conversation with Hank Green, Jul 10,
https://www.magersandquinn.com/product_info?isbn_id=26578312&products;_id=163359157

Upcoming books: "Poesy the Monster Slayer" (Jul 2020), a picture book
about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Pre-order here:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed
copy here:
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1562/_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer.html.

"Attack Surface": The third Little Brother book, Oct 20, 2020.
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250757531

"Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new
introduction by Edward Snowden:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies
here:
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html

This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
That means you can use it any way you like, including commerically,
provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link
to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are
included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the
basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🏄🏿‍♀️ How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/web/accounts/303320

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and
advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

*When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla* -Joey "Accordion Guy"
DeVilla


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.flarn.com/pipermail/plura-list/attachments/20200624/3e6621af/attachment-0001.sig>