[Plura-list] Consumerism won't defeat Georgia's Jim Crow; China's antitrust surge

Cory Doctorow doctorow at craphound.com
Sat Apr 3 14:22:42 EDT 2021


Today's links

* Consumerism won't defeat Georgia's Jim Crow: You're not an ambulatory
wallet.

* China's antitrust surge: "Consumer welfare" means corporate rule.

* This day in history: None

* Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current
writing projects, current reading

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🙉 Consumerism won't defeat Georgia's Jim Crow

In the 1970s, progressives discovered a shortcut to political change:
the boycott. Boycotts had been around for a long time, to be sure, but
with industries in relatively weak states, with lots of competitors, the
threat of lost business could spur fast action.

Politics were slow and unreliable. Lawsuits were expensive, slow and
unreliable. Boycotts were fast, and involved direct, tangible steps that
every person could take: redirect your spending from one company to
another, make the change.

But as progressive movements ceded the political realm, reactionaries
conquered it. Reagan and his successors (including pro-business Dems)
enacted laws and policies that encouraged monopolies and weakened labor
unions.

40 years later, boycotts are dead.

Hate excessive packaging?

Good news: the grocery aisle has minimal packaging alternatives you can
vote your dollars on.

Bad news: these "alternatives" come from the same companies as the
high-packaging products you're "voting against."

Boycotts only work when there's competition. As this Simpsons screenshot
demonstrates - Duff Lite, Duff Dry and Duff all come from the same pipe.

Likewise: Fox Studios, who made the Simpsons, are now part of Disney.

Don't like Fox? Vote with your dollars on Disney!

Right-wing politics have a problem. If your fundamental belief is that a
small number of people should have more (money, power, influence) than
everyone else, then by definition, your politics only benefit a
minority, and you win elections with majorities.

The right has three tactics to overcome this.

I. It relies on antimajoritarian institutions, like the Electoral
College and the Senate. That's why the Dems should *absolutely* kill the
filibuster, which protects Senate power, which is minority power, which
is plute power.

II. It suppresses the votes and power of working people, through
gerrymandering, poll taxes, voter-roll purges and anti-union rules that
shatter the collective power of otherwise atomized and powerless workers.

III. It convinces turkeys to vote for Christmas. Performative
culture-war bullshit, white nationalism, transphobic panics, etc - none
of these are intrinsic to the right-wing project, but they bring a lot
of scared bigots out to vote for dead-eyed corporate rule.

The new Jim Crow law just adopted in Georgia is a perfect example of how
these three tactics deliver power to corporate power. It's a voter
suppression law, passed by a gerrymandered statehouse that represents a
minority of Georgians, which exploits white nationalism.

Remember, the reason corporate America is worried about Georgia is the
Black, working-class-led political machine that threatens to enact
majority rule in a place whose state and national leaders are essential
to inequality-boosting, plute-enriching, worker-destroying rule.

The reason all these red states introduced nearly identical
voter-suppression bills is that they all get their laws from the same
place: ALEC, a business-backed thinktank that writes and pushes "model
legislation" in state- and local governments.

https://www.salon.com/2021/03/27/conservative-groups-are-writing-gop-voter-suppression-bills---and-spending-millions-to-pass-them/

ALEC finds its wins in GOP legislatures, but it gets its funding from a
broad cross-section of corporate America, including companies that
publicly brief for racial and gender justice.

https://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/who-still-funds-alec/

Now, ALEC has faced something of an exodus, losing members like AT&T and
Google, but that doesn't mean that they've divested from ALEC policies.

The politicians who carry water for ALEC are 100% dependent on campaign
contributions from orgs like the Chamber of Commerce.

These politicians brief for policies that hurt the majority of
Americans, and can only get elected through voter suppression,
gerrymandering and appeals to bigotry. There's no other way to win
electoral majorities while espousing antimajoritarian policies.

This doesn't mean that corporate execs and employees aren't horrified by
Georgia's New Jim Crow law - it just means that they can't do anything
about it. Companies that halt donations to the GA GOP will *still*
financially support them, through their industry associations.

It's a perfect macrocosm of the consumer's dilemma: if you rely on
money, rather than politics, to accomplish political change, you will
never make a change that reduces the power of money in politics. It's
impossible to spend your way out of monopoly capitalism.

At best, it's merely useless. At worst, it's a net negative, sucking up
the hours you could spend on political change with comparison shopping.
As Zephyr Teachout points out in BREAK 'EM UP, what you do matters more
than what you spend.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/29/break-em-up/#break-em-up

If you're organizing to support union drives, don't waste time shopping
to "buy local" for posterboard and markers - they're all manufactured by
anti-union monopolists, no matter who sells them. Get whatever's easiest
and then go fight the companies in the *political* realm.

Stop conceiving of yourself as an ambulatory wallet, whose only power
comes from where and how you spend - if you only vote your dollars,
you'll always lose, because the rich have more dollars than you and so
they get more votes.

Keep your eyes on the prize: smashing corporate power. Far more exciting
than the MLB boycott of Georgia is the Republican response: GOP
hardliners want to take away baseball's antitrust exemption.

https://twitter.com/matthewstoller/status/1378103553437360131

If this happens, it will be the absolute best possible outcome - because
it represents the shattering of the coalition that makes
antimajoritarian politics possible. If the right starts siding with
bigots and AGAINST companies, they'll cut their own supply lines.

The voter suppression, gerrymandering and bigotry that the GOP relies on
is expensive. It can't exist without corporate power. The reason it
exists in the first place is corporate power.

Reinvigorating antitrust as an act of performative culture-war bullshit
is the political equivalent of pointing a gun at your own dick to own
the libs and then blowing your actual dick off.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/05/27/literal-gunhumping/#youll-shoot-your-eye-out

These are the fracture lines we need to exploit. They've been
proliferating for years. The modern antitrust revival comes out of these
fracture lines.

It's an open secret that much of the money and energy for anti-Big Tech
trustbusting comes from the cable industry.

Comcast and AT&T hate Google and Facebook, but not for the same reason
you or I do. In their view, the billions Googbook make from
surveillance, rent-extraction and manipulation have been misapproriated
from the telecoms industry.

They have made the catastrophic blunder of betting that if they awaken
the slumbering antitrust giant to smash Big Tech, that it will then go
back to sleep - and that it *certainly won't turn on *them*.

This is such galaxy-brain idiocy. Like the public will watch a new army
of trustbusters arise to rip apart Googbook and then say, "You know
what? I just *fucking love Comcast*, so whatever you do, don't give them
the same treatment."

A bet that after the dust settles, the hard-fighting lawyers, activists,
politicans and workers who smashed corporate power in Big Tech will
realize that they were only worried about "surveillance capitalism" but
were totally cool with all the other kinds of capitalism.

Consumer power is a dead letter. Political power is a live wire.
Boycotts are a distraction, even - especially - when giant corporations
engage in them.

But the other stuff - strikes, trustbusting, ending financial secrecy -
that's where change comes from.

The problem with the world isn't where you shop.

You're not an ambulatory wallet and don't let anyone convince you that
you are.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🙉 China's antitrust surge

When the DoJ broke up AT&T - at long last! - in 1982, apologists for
corporate power claimed that they were signing America's death-warrant.
AT&T, they claimed, was the US's national champion in an existential
battle with Japan.

Japan, we were told, was an authoritarian country, a systemic threat to
the world whose fascist aggression had led to untold suffering. What's
more, they were copycats, IP thieves, who stole American ingenuity and
then undercut American manufacturers.

Sound familiar? It should. It's what Facebook lobbyists are saying about
antitrust action against China: "Break us up and you'll cost America its
national champion in the existential fight with a remorseless,
authoritarian Asian copycat empire."

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-antitrust-hearing-1034575/

But the race-baiting yellow peril rhetoric of AT&T's shills was
bullshit. AT&T's major project - the thing it used its monopoly power to
protect - was the suppression of public access to the internet, because
it wanted to maintain centralized telecoms power.

Breaking up AT&T was essential to the spread of public internet access,
and that decidedly did *notU cost America the war for technological
hegemony with Japan. Monopolists aren't national champions - they are
weights around the nation's ankles.

"What's good for GM" was never "what's good for America." At best it was
"what's good for the tiny minority of American GM shareholders." It was
pretty terrible for everyone else.

Monopolies corrupt politics, translating their excess profits and
concentrated decision-making power into political outcomes that benefit
themselves irrespective of the costs to the rest of us.

Which explains a lot about Xi Xinping's relationship with China's
internet monopolies. Xi recognizes that a monopolized ICT sector vastly
simplifies censorship and surveillance - but at the cost of creating
vast power-centers that challenge his own decision-making authority.

That's why XI curb-stomped Jack Ma in November, crushing
Alibaba/Alipay's dream of going into the loansharking business - Ma made
a bid to supplant the Chinese central bank's power over the monetary
supply and Xi wasn't having any of it.

https://pluralistic.net/2020/11/05/gotta-be-a-pony-under-there/#jack-ma

Now, China is ramping up its antitrust enforcement against its own tech
giants, moving beyond Alibaba to Tencent, Baidu, Didi and other massive
companies that Facebook claims it will defend us from.

https://www.axios.com/china-tech-antitrust-regulation-scrutiny-15a90d75-4b7a-40e8-805f-3ca29c6eb6cd.html

These companies might serve as China's "national champions," but only to
the extent that "What's good for Baidu is good for China." When those
interests diverge, Baidu is looking out for Baidu, not Beijing.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🙉 This day in history

#10yrsago TEDxObserver talk on kids and privacy
https://www.theguardian.com/tedx/cory-doctorow-privacy

#5yrsago Panama Papers: Largest leak in history reveals political and
business elite hiding trillions in offshore havens
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/the-panama-papers-how-the-worlds-rich-and-famous-hide-their-money-offshore

#5yrsago America’s teachers are being trained in a harsh interrogation
technique that produces false confessions
https://web.archive.org/web/20160404143447/https://www.alternet.org/education/why-are-k-12-school-leaders-being-trained-coercive-interrogation-techniques/

#5yrsago LA’s new rule: homeless people are only allowed to own one
trashcan’s worth of things
https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-apartments-demolished-20160402-story.html

#1yrago Amazon's leaked anti-worker smear plan
https://pluralistic.net/2020/04/03/socially-useless-parasite/#christian-smalls

#1yrago The Tea Party killed pandemic preparedness
https://pluralistic.net/2020/04/03/socially-useless-parasite/#you-were-warned

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🙉 Colophon

Today's top sources: Naked Capitalism (https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/).

Currently writing:

* A cyberpunk noir thriller novel, "Red Team Blues." Yesterday's
progress: 1048 words (48883 total).

Currently reading: Analogia by George Dyson.

Latest podcast: Past Performance is Not Indicative of Future Results
https://craphound.com/news/2021/03/28/past-performance-is-not-indicative-of-future-results/

Upcoming appearances:

* All the Teachable Things I Know About Writing, Apr 13,
https://www.changinghands.com/event/april2021/virtual-writing-workshop-cory-doctorow-all-teachable-things-i-know-about-writing

* Interop: Self-Determination vs Dystopia (FITC), Apr 19-21,
https://fitc.ca/presentation/interop/

Recent appearances:

* The Right to Repair Movement, Monopolies, and Solarpunk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmosdDCrL-4

* The surveillance state, digital monopolies, and why we should be
worried (Podsongs)
https://anchor.fm/podsongs/episodes/Cory-Doctorow-on-the-Surveillance-State--digital-monopolies--and-why-we-should-be-worried-eso43k

* Conspiracy Theories (Utopian Horizons):
https://soundcloud.com/utopianhorizons/conspiracy-theory-w-cory-doctorow

Latest book:

* "Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone
technothriller for adults. The *Washington Post* called it "a political
cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution
and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html

* "How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet
analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a
solution.
https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59
(print edition:
https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907)
(signed copies:
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)

* "Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new
introduction by Edward Snowden:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies
here:
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html

* "Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime,
gender, and kicking ass. Order here:
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed
copy here:
https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1562/_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer.html.

Upcoming books:

* The Shakedown, with Rebecca Giblin, nonfiction/business/politics,
Beacon Press 2022

This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially,
provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link
to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are
included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the
basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🙉 How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/web/accounts/303320

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and
advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"*When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla*" -Joey "Accordion
Guy" DeVilla

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.flarn.com/pipermail/plura-list/attachments/20210403/3e645635/attachment.sig>


More information about the Plura-list mailing list