[Plura-list] Linkty Dumpty

Cory Doctorow doctorow at craphound.com
Sat Jul 15 14:48:20 EDT 2023 

Read today's issue online at: https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/15/in-the-dumps/

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

Next Tues, Jul 18, I'm hosting the first Clarion Summer Write-In Series, an hour-long, free drop-in group writing and discussion session. It's in support of the Clarion SF/F writing workshop's fundraiser to offer tuition support to students:

https://mailchi.mp/theclarionfoundation/clarion-write-ins

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_


Today's links

* Linkty Dumpty: Things I thought about when I was supposed to be on holidays.

* This day in history: 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018

* Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current writing projects, current reading

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🕴🏻 Linkty Dumpty

I was *supposed* to be on vacation, and while I didn't do any blogging for a month, that didn't mean that I stopped looking at my distraction rectangle and making a list of things I wanted to write about. Consequentially, the link backlog is *massive*, so it's time to declare bankruptcy with another linkdump:

https://pluralistic.net/tag/linkdump/

Let's kick things off with a little graphic whimsy. You've doubtless seen the endless Trolley Problem memes, working from the same crude line drawings? Well, philosopher John Holbo got tired of that artwork, and he whomped up a fantastic alternative, which you can get as a poster, duvet, sticker, tee, etc:

https://www.redbubble.com/shop/ap/145078097

The trolley problem has been with us since 1967, but it's enjoying a renaissance thanks to the insistence of "AI" weirdos that it is very relevant to our AI debate. A few years back, you could impress uninformed people by dropping the Trolley Problem into a discussion:

https://memex.craphound.com/2016/10/25/mercedes-weird-trolley-problem-announcement-continues-dumb-debate-about-self-driving-cars/

Amazingly, the "AI" debate has only gotten *more* tedious since the middle of the past decade. But every now and again, someone gets a stochastic parrot to do something genuinely delightful, like the Jolly Roger Telephone Company, who sell chatbots that will pretend to be tantalyzingly confused marks in order to tie up telemarketers and waste their time:

https://jollyrogertelephone.com/

Jolly Roger sells different personas: "Whitebeard" is a confused senior who keeps asking the caller's name, drops nonsequiturs into the conversation, and can't remember how many credit-cards he has. "Salty Sally" is a single mom with a houseful of screaming, demanding children who keep distracting her every time the con artist is on the verge of getting her to give up compromising data. "Whiskey Jack" is drunk:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/people-hire-phone-bots-to-torture-telemarketers-2dbb8457

The bots take a couple minutes to get the sense of the conversation going. During that initial lag, they have a bunch of stock responses like "there's a bee on my arm, but keep going," or grunts like "huh," and "uh-huh." The bots can keep telemarketers and scammers on the line for quite a long time. Scambaiting is an old and honorable vocation, and it's good that it has received a massive productivity gain from automation. This is the AI Dividend I dream of.

The less-fun AI debate is the one over artists' rights and tech. I am foresquare for the artists here, but I think that the preferred solutions (like creating a new copyright over the right to train a model with your work) will not lead to the hoped-for outcome. As with other copyright expansions - 40 years' worth of them now - this right will be immediately transferred to the highly concentrated media sector, who will simply amend their standard, non-negotiable contracting terms to require that "training rights" be irrevocably assigned to them as a condition of working.

The real solution isn't to treat artists as atomic individuals - LLCs with an MFA - who bargain, business-to-business, with corporations. Rather, the solutions are in collective power, like unions. You've probably heard about the SAG-AFTRA actors' strike, in which creative workers are bargaining as a group to demand fair treatment in an age of generative models. SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher's speech announcing the strike made me want to stand up and salute:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4SAPOX7R5M

The actors' strike is historic: it marks the first time actors have struck since 2000, and it's the first time actors and *writers* have co-struck since 1960. Of course, writers in the Writers Guild of America (West and East) have been picketing since since April, and one of their best spokespeople has been Adam Conover, a WGA board member who serves on the negotiating committee. Conover is best known for his stellar Adam Ruins Everything comedy-explainer TV show, which pioneered a technique for breaking down complex forms of corporate fuckery and making you laugh while he does it. Small wonder that he's been so effective at conveying the strike issues while he pickets.

Writing for *Jacobin*, Alex N Press profiles Conover and interviews him about the strike, under the *excellent* headline, "Adam Pickets Everything." Conover is characteristically funny, smart, and incisive - do read:

https://jacobin.com/2023/07/adam-conover-wga-strike

Of course, not everyone in Hollywood is striking. In late June, the DGA accepted a studio deal with an anemic 41% vote turnout:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/26/23773926/dga-amptp-new-deal-strike

They probably shouldn't have. In this interview with *The American Prospect*'s Peter Hong, the brilliant documentary director Amy Ziering breaks down how Netflix and the other streamers have rugged documentarians in a classic enshittification ploy that lured in filmmakers, extracted everything they had, and then discarded the husks:

https://prospect.org/culture/2023-06-21-drowned-in-the-stream/

Now, the streaming cartel stands poised to all but kill off documentary filmmaking. Pressured by Wall Street to drive high returns, they've become ultraconservative in their editorial decisions, making programs and films that are as similar as possible to existing successes, that are unchallenging, and that are *cheap*. We've gone directly from a golden age of docs to a dark age.

In a time of monopolies, it's tempting to form countermonopolies to keep them in check. Yesterday, I wrote about why the FTC and Lina Khan were right to try to block the Microsoft/Activision merger, and I heard from a lot of people saying this merger was the only way to check Sony's reign of terror over video games:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/14/making-good-trouble/#the-peoples-champion

But replacing one monopolist with another isn't good for anyone (except the monopolists' shareholders). If we want audiences and workers - and society - to benefit, we have to *de-monopolize* the sector. Last month, I published a series with EFF about how we should save the news from Big Tech:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/saving-news-big-tech

After that came out, the *EU Observer* asked me to write up version of it with direct reference to the EU, where there are a lot of (in my opinion, ill-conceived but well-intentioned) efforts to pry Big Tech's boot off the news media's face. I'm really happy with how it came out, and the header graphic is *awesome*:

https://euobserver.com/opinion/157187

De-monopolizing tech has become my life's work, both because tech is foundational (tech is how we organize to fight over labor, gender and race equality, and climate justice), and because tech has all of these *technical* aspects, which open up new avenues for shrinking Big Tech, without waiting decades for traditional antitrust breakups to run their course (we need these too, though!).

I've written a book laying out a shovel-ready plan to give tech back to its users through interoperability, explaining how to make new regulations (and reform old ones), what they should say, how to enforce them, and how to detect and stop cheating. It's called "The Internet Con: How To Seize the Means of Computation" and it's coming from Verso Books this September:

https://www.versobooks.com/products/3035-the-internet-con

I just got my first copy in the mail yesterday, and it's a gorgeous little package. The timing was great, because I spent the whole week in the studio at Skyboat Media recording the audiobook - the first audiobook of mine that I've narrated. It was a fantastic experience, and I'll be launching a Kickstarter to presell the DRM-free audio and ebooks as well as hardcovers, in a couple weeks.

Though I like doing these crowdfunders, I do them because I *have* to. Amazon's Audible division, the monopolist that controls >90% of the audiobook market, refuses to carry my work because it is DRM-free. When you buy a DRM-free audiobook, that means that you can play it on *anyone's* app, not just Amazon's. Every audiobook you've ever bought from Audible will disappear the moment you decide to break up with Amazon, which means that Amazon can absolutely *screw* authors and audiobook publishers because they've taken our customers hostage.

If you are unwise enough to pursue an MBA, you will learn a term of art for this kind of market structure: it's a "moat," that is, an element of the market that makes it hard for new firms to enter the market and compete with you. Warren Buffett pioneered the use of this term, and now it's all but mandatory for anyone launching a business or new product to explain where *their* moat will come from.

As Dan Davies writes, these "moats" aren't really moats in the Buffett sense. With Coke and Disney, he says, a "moat" was "the fact that nobody else could make such a great product that everyone wanted." In other words, "making a good product," is a great moat:

https://backofmind.substack.com/p/stuck-in-the-moat

But making a good product is a lot of work and not everyone is capable of it. Instead, "moat" now just means some form of lock in. Davies counsels us to replace "moat" with:

> our subscription system and proprietary interface mean that our return on capital is protected by a strong Berlin Wall, preventing our customers from getting out to a freer society and forcing them to consume our inferior products for lack of alternative.

I really like this. It pairs well with my 2020 observation that the fight over whether "IP" is a meaningful term can be settled by recognizing that IP has a precise meaning in business: "Any policy that lets me reach beyond the walls of my firm to control the conduct of my competitors, critics and customers":

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

To see how that works in the real world, check out "The Anti-Ownership Ebook Economy," a magisterial piece of scholarship from Sarah Lamdan, Jason M. Schultz, Michael Weinberg and Claire Woodcock:

https://www.nyuengelberg.org/outputs/the-anti-ownership-ebook-economy/

> Something happened when we shifted to digital formats that created a loss of rights for readers. Pulling back the curtain on the evolution of ebooks offers some clarity to how the shift to digital left ownership behind in the analog world.

The research methodology combines both anonymous and named sources in publishing, bookselling and librarianship, as well as expert legal and economic analysis. This is an eminently readable, extremely smart, and really useful contribution to the scholarship on how "IP" (in the modern sense) has transformed books from something you own to something that you can *never* own.

The truth is, capitalists hate capitalism. Inevitably, the kind of person who presides over a giant corporation and wields power over millions of lives - workers, suppliers and customers - believes themselves to be uniquely and supremely qualified to be a wise dictator. For this kind of person, competition is "wasteful" and distracts them from the important business of making everyone's life better by handing down unilateral - but wise and clever - edits. Think of Peter Thiel's maxim, "competition is for losers."

That's why giant companies *love* to merge with each other, and buy out nascent competitors. By rolling up the power to decide how you and I and everyone else live our lives, these executives ensure that they can help us little people live the best lives possible. The traditional role of antitrust enforcement is to prevent this from happening, countering the delusions of would-be life-tenured autocrats of trade with public accountability and enforcement:

https://marker.medium.com/we-should-not-endure-a-king-dfef34628153

Of course, for 40 years, we've had neoliberal, Reaganomics-poisoned antitrust, where monopolies are celebrated as "efficient" and their leaders exalted as geniuses whose commercial empires are evidence of merit, not savagery. That era is, thankfully, coming to an end, and not a moment too soon.

Leading the fight is the aforementioned FTC chair Lina Khan, who is taking *huge* swings at even bigger mergers. But the EU is no slouch in this department: they're challenging the Adobe/Figma merger, a $20b transaction that is obviously and solely designed to recapture customers who left Adobe because they didn't want to struggle under its yoke any longer:

https://gizmodo.com/adobe-figma-acquisition-likely-to-face-eu-investigation-1850555562

For autocrats of trade, this is an intolerable act of disloyalty. We owe them our fealty and subservience, because they are self-evidently better at understanding what we need than we could ever be. This unwarranted self-confidence from the ordinary mediocrities who end up running giant tech companies gets them into a whole lot of hot water.

One keen observer of the mind-palaces that tech leaders trap themselves in is Anil Dash, who describes the conspiratorial, far-right turn of the most powerful men (almost all men!) in Silicon Valley in a piece called "'VC Qanon' and the radicalization of the tech tycoons":

https://www.anildash.com/2023/07/07/vc-qanon/

Dash builds on an editorial he published in Feb, "The tech tycoon martyrdom charade," which explores the sense of victimhood the most powerful, wealthiest people in the Valley project:

https://www.anildash.com/2023/02/27/tycoon-martyrdom-charade/

These dudes are prisoners of their Great Man myth, and leads them badly astray. And while all of us are prone to lapses in judgment and discernment, Dash makes the case that tech leaders are *especially* prone to it:

> Nobody becomes a billionaire by accident. You have to have wanted that level of power, control and wealth more than you wanted anything else in your life. They all sacrifice family, relationships, stability, community, connection, and belonging in service of keeping score on a scale that actually yields no additional real-world benefits on the path from that first $100 million to the tens of billions.

This makes billionaires "a cohort that is, counterintutively, very easily manipulated." What's more, they're all master manipulators, and they all hang out with each other, which means that when a conspiratorial belief takes root in one billionaire's brain, it spreads to the rest of them like wildfire.

Then, billionaires "push each other further and further into extreme ideas because their entire careers have been predicated on the idea that they're genius outliers who can see things others can't, and that their wealth is a reward for that imagined merit."

They live in privileged bubbles, which insulates them from disconfirming evidence - ironic, given how many of these bros think they are wise senators in the agora.

There are examples of billionaires' folly all around us today, of course. Take privacy: the idea that we can - we should - we *must* - spy on everyone, all the time, in every way, to eke out tiny gains in ad performance is objectively *batshit*. And yet, wealthy people decreed this should be so, and it was, and made them far richer.

Leaked data from Microsoft's Xandr ad-targeting database reveals how the commercial surveillance delusion led us to a bizarre and terrible place, as reported on by *The Markup*:

https://themarkup.org/privacy/2023/06/08/from-heavy-purchasers-of-pregnancy-tests-to-the-depression-prone-we-found-650000-ways-advertisers-label-you

*The Markup's* report lets you plumb 650,000 targeting categories, searching by keyword or loading random sets, 20 at a time. Do you want to target gambling addicts, people taking depression meds or Jews? Xrandr's got you covered. What could possibly go wrong?

The Xrandr files come from German security researcher Wolfie Christl from Cracked Labs. Christi is a European, and he's working with the German digital rights group Netzpolitik to get the EU to scrutinize all the ways that Xrandr is flouting EU privacy laws.

Billionaires' big ideas lead us astray in more tangible ways, of course. Writing in *The Conversation*, John Quiggin asks us to take a hard look at the much ballyhooed (and *expensively* ballyhooed) "nuclear renaissance":

https://theconversation.com/dutton-wants-australia-to-join-the-nuclear-renaissance-but-this-dream-has-failed-before-209584

Despite the rhetoric, nukes aren't cheap, and they aren't coming back. Georgia's new nuclear power is behind schedule and over budget, but it's still better off than South Carolina's nukes, which were so over budget that they were abandoned in 2017. France's nuke is a decade behind schedule. Finland's opened this year - 14 years late. The UK's Hinkley Point C reactor is massively behind schedule and over budget (and when it's done, it will be owned by the French government!).

China's nuclear success story also doesn't hold up to scrutiny - they've brought 50GW of nukes online, sure, but they're building 95-120GW of solar *every year*.

Solar is the clear winner here, along with other renewables, which are plummeting in cost (while nukes soar) and are accelerating in deployments (while nukes are plagued with ever-worsening delays).

This is the second nuclear renaissance - the last one, 20 years ago, was a bust, and that was *before* renewables got cheap, reliable and easy to manufacture and deploy. You'll hear fairy-tales about how the early 2000s bust was caused by political headwinds, but that's simply untrue: there were almost no anti-nuke marches then, and governments were scrambling to figure out low-carbon alternatives to fossil fuels (this was before the latest round of fossil fuel sabotage).

The current renaissance is also doomed. Yes, new reactors are smaller and safer and won't have the problems intrinsic to all megaprojects, but designs like VOYGR have virtually no signed deals. Even if they do get built, their capacity will be dwarfed by renewables - a Gen III nuke will generate 710MW of power. Globally, we add that much solar *every single day*.

And solar power is *cheap*. Even after US subsidies, a Gen III reactor would charge A$132/MWh - current prices are as low as A$64-$114/MWh.

Nukes are getting a charm offensive because wealthy people are investing in hype as a way of reaping profits - not as a way of generating safe, cheap, reliable energy.

Here in the latest stage of capitalism, value and profit are fully decoupled. Monopolists are shifting more and more value from suppliers and customers to their shareholders every day. And when the customer is the government, the depravity knows no bounds. In *Responsible Statecraft*, Connor Echols describes how military contractors like Boeing are able to bill the Pentagon $52,000 for a *trash can*:

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/06/20/the-pentagons-52000-trash-can/

Military Beltway Bandits are nothing new, of course, but they've gotten far more virulent since the Obama era, when Obama's DoD demanded that the primary contractors merge to a bare handful of giant firms, in the name of "efficiency." As David Dayen writes in his must-read 2020 book *Monopolized*, this opened the door to a new kind of predator:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/01/29/fractal-bullshit/#dayenu

The Obama defense rollups were quickly followed by another wave of rollups, these ones driven by Private Equity firms who cataloged which subcontractors were "sole suppliers" of components used by the big guys. These companies were all acquired by PE funds, who then *lowered* the price of their products, selling them below cost.

This maximized the use of those parts in weapons and aircraft sold by primary contractors like Boeing, which created a durable, long-lasting demand for fresh parts for DoD maintenance of its materiel. PE-owned suppliers hits Uncle Sucker with *multi-thousand-percent* markups for these parts, which have now wormed their way into every corner of the US arsenal.

Yes, this is infuriating as hell, but it's also so grotesquely wrong that it's impossible to defend, as we see in this *hilarious* clip of Rep Katie Porter grilling witnesses on US military waste:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJhf6l1nB9A

Porter pulls out the best version yet of her infamous white-board and makes her witnesses play defense ripoff Jepoardy!, providing answers to a series of indefensible practices.

It's sure nice when our government does something *for* us, isn't it? We absolutely *can* have nice things, and we're about to get them. The Infrastructure Bill contains $42B in subsidies for fiber rollouts across the country, which will be given to states to spend. *Ars Technica*'s Jon Brodkin breaks down the state-by-state spending:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/06/us-allocates-42b-in-broadband-funding-find-out-how-much-your-state-will-get/

Texas will get $3.31B, California will get $1.86B, and 17 other states will get $1B or more. As the White House announcement put it, "High-speed Internet is no longer a luxury."

To understand how radical this is, you need to know that for decades, the cable and telco sector has grabbed billions in subsidies for rural and underserved communities, and then either stole the money outright, or wasted it building *copper* networks that run at a fraction of a percent of fiber speeds.

This is how America - the birthplace of the internet - ended up with some of the world's slowest, most expensive broadband, even after handing out tens of billions of dollars in subsidies. Those subsidies were gobbled up by greedy, awful phone companies - these ones *must* be spent wisely, on long-lasting, long-overdue fiber infrastructure.

That's a good note to end on, but I've got an even better one: birds in the Netherlands are tearing apart anti-bird strips and *using them to build their nests*. Wonderful creatures 1, hostile architecture, 0. Nature is healing:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jul/11/crows-and-magpies-show-their-metal-by-using-anti-bird-spikes-to-build-nests

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🕴🏻 This day in history

#20yrsago Reality shows: pointing the way to the panopticon future http://www.coherenceengine.com/blog/2003_07_01_archive.html#105830809488576022

#20yrsago How to fight for privacy https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram/archives/2003/0715.html#1

#20yrsago MSFT provides tools to defeat its own DRM https://web.archive.org/web/20030730184611/http://openp2p.com/pub/wlg/3517

#20yrsago Amtrak is faking it https://web.archive.org/web/20030718092819/https://www.oblomovka.com/entries/2003/07/15

#20yrsago Love in the age of spyware https://www.salon.com/2003/07/16/city_of_angels/

#15yrsago Tiny sovereign Dutch neighborhoods in Belgian town https://bldgblog.com/2008/07/baarle-hertog/

#15yrsago Pedo-crazed parents call father a “pervert” for photographing his own children at a park https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1035315/Father-branded-pervert--photographing-children-public-park.html

#10yrsago Saga: visually stunning, sweet and exciting space opera comic from Brian “Y: The Last Man” Vaughan https://memex.craphound.com/2013/07/15/saga-visually-stunning-sweet-and-exciting-space-opera-comic-from-brian-y-the-last-man-vaughan/

#5yrsago Ben Carson wants to raise rents on public housing tenants by 300%+, attacking elderly, people with disabilities and working poor https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/ben-carson-says-hes-raising-rents-to-put-poor-americans-to-work--but-in-the-district-the-majority-are-either-elderly-or-disabled-or-already-work/2018/07/13/b85866a0-8127-11e8-b658-4f4d2a1aeef1_story.html?noredirect=on

#5yrsago Dianne Feinstein has lost the California Democrats’ Senate-race endorsement to a left-wing insurgent long-shot https://theintercept.com/2018/07/15/kevin-de-leon-stuns-dianne-feinstein-wins-california-democratic-party-endorsement-in-a-landslide/

#5yrsago Avowed “utopian anarchist” Elon Musk is also one of the top donors to the GOP “Protect the House” PAC https://www.salon.com/2018/07/14/elon-musk-revealed-as-one-of-the-largest-donors-for-a-house-republican-pac/

#5yrsago Chinese iPhones crash when users try to type Taiwanese flag characters https://objective-see.org/blog/blog_0x34.html

#5yrsago The world’s most popular smartphones are underpowered, unusable hot messes https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/big-tech-apps-for-the-next-billion-underperform

#5yrsago Sky blue, water wet, porn filters don’t work https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2017.0466

#5yrsago America’s largest fast-food chains forced to end conspiracy not to hire people looking for better-paid McJobs https://www.npr.org/2018/07/12/628549616/fast-food-chains-back-away-from-limits-on-whom-they-hire

Colophon (permalink)

Today's top sources: Slashdot (https://slashdot.org), Naked Capitalism (https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/), Brad DeLong (https://braddelong.substack.com/), Crooked Timber (https://crookedtimber.org/), Boing Boing (https://boingboing.net).

Currently writing:

* A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING

* Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

* The Bezzle, a Martin Hench noir thriller novel about the prison-tech industry. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

* Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. ON SUBMISSION

* Moral Hazard, a short story for MIT Tech Review's 12 Tomorrows. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION

* Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. ON SUBMISSION

Latest podcast: Ideas Lying Around https://craphound.com/news/2023/06/11/ideas-lying-around/

Upcoming appearances:

* Clarion Summer Write-In Series, Jul 18
https://mailchi.mp/theclarionfoundation/clarion-write-ins

* Comic-Con (San Diego), Jul 20-23
https://www.comic-con.org/cci/programming-schedule

* Armadillocon (Austin), Aug 4-6
https://armadillocon.org/d45/

* Defcon (Las Vegas), Aug 10-13
https://defcon.org/

Upcoming appearances:

* Clarion Summer Write-In Series, Jul 18
https://mailchi.mp/theclarionfoundation/clarion-write-ins

* Comic-Con (San Diego), Jul 20-23
https://www.comic-con.org/cci/programming-schedule

* Armadillocon (Austin), Aug 4-6
https://armadillocon.org/d45/

* Defcon (Las Vegas), Aug 10-13
https://defcon.org/

Recent appearances:

* UCL Peter Kirstein Lecture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn47ptAtVH0

* The Homeless Romantic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXn9wy5bHq0

* Why the internet is getting worse
https://www.cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/209-front-burner/episode/15992083-why-the-internet-is-getting-worse

Latest books:

* "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com. Signed copies at Dark Delicacies (US):  and Forbidden Planet (UK): https://forbiddenplanet.com/385004-red-team-blues-signed-edition-hardcover/.

* "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com

* "Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone technothriller for adults. The *Washington Post* called it "a political cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html

* "How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a solution. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59 (print edition: https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907) (signed copies: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)

* "Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new introduction by Edward Snowden: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html

* "Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Order here: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed copy here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2682/Corey_Doctorow%3A_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer_HB.html#/.

Upcoming books:

* The Internet Con: A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech, Verso, September 2023

* The Lost Cause: a post-Green New Deal eco-topian novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias, Tor Books, November 2023

This work - excluding any serialized fiction - is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

(Latest Medium column: "Let the Platforms Burn: The Opposite of Good Fires is Wildfires" https://doctorow.medium.com/let-the-platforms-burn-6fb3e6c0d980)

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla

More information about the Plura-list mailing list