[Plura-list] Venture predation

Fri May 19 10:54:01 EDT 2023

Read today's issue online at: https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/19/fake-it-till-you-make-it/

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

Tomorrow (May 20), I'll be at the Gaithersburg Book Festival with my novel *Red Team Blues*:

https://www.gaithersburgbookfestival.org/featured_author/cory-doctorow/

Monday (May 22), I'm keynoting Public Knowledge's Emerging Tech conference in DC:

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/emerging-tech-tickets-600582126307

Tuesday (May 23), I'll be in Toronto for a book launch that's part of WEPFest, a benefit for the *West End Phoenix*, onstage with Dave Bidini (The Rheostatics), Ron Diebert (Citizen Lab) and the whistleblower Dr Nancy Olivieri:

https://www.westendphoenix.com/shop/wepfest-spring-fundraiser

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

Today's links

* Venture predation: A pile of shit this big MUST have a pony underneath it!

* Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.

* This day in history: 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2022

* Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current writing projects, current reading

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🧜‍♂️ Venture predation

They said it couldn't happen. After decades of antitrust enforcement against Predatory Pricing - selling goods below cost to kill existing competitors and prevent new ones from arising - the Chicago School of neoliberal economists "proved" that predatory pricing didn't exist and that the courts could stand down and stop busting companies for it.

Predatory pricing - the economists explained - may be illegal, but it was also imaginary. A mirage. No one would do predatory pricing, because it was "irrational." And even if there was someone irrational enough to try it, they would fail. Stand down, judges of America - predatory pricing is solved.

Chicago School economists - whose job (to quote David Roth) is to find new ways to say "actually, your boss is right" - held enormous sway of the federal judiciary. The billionaire-backed Manne Seminars offered free "continuing education" junkets to judges - all-expense-paid luxury vacations salted with lengthy your-boss-is-right econ seminars. 40% of the US federal judiciary got their heads filled up at a Manne Seminar.

For monopolists and other predators, the Manne Seminar was an excellent return on investment. After attending a Manne Seminar, the average judge's legal decisions tipped decidedly in favor of monopoly, operating on the Chicago bedrock assumption that monopolies are "efficient," and, where we see them in nature, we should celebrate them as the visible manifestation of the entrepreneurial genius of some Ayn Rand hero in a corporate boardroom:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/13/post-bork-era/#manne-down

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Even as post-Chicago economists showed that predatory pricing was both possible and rampant, a "rational" and effective strategy for cornering markets, suppressing competition, crushing innovation and gouging on price, judges continued to craft tortuous, unpassable tests that any predatory pricing case would have to satisfy to proceed. Economic moved on, but predatory pricing cases continued to fail the trial-by-ordeal constructed by Chicago-pilled judges.

Which is a shame, because there are at least three ways that predatory pricing can be effective:

I. Cost Signaling Predation: A predator tricks competitors into thinking they've found a new way to cut their costs, which allows them to drop prices. Competitors, fooled by the ruse, exit the market, not realizing that the predator is merely subsidizing their products' costs to trick them.

II. Financial Market Predation: A predator tricks the competitors' *creditors* into thinking the predator has a new way to cut costs. The creditors refuse to loan the prey companies the money needed to survive the price war, and the prey drops out of the war.

III. Reputation Effect Predation: A predator subsidizes prices in one region or one line of goods in order to trick prey into thinking that they'll do the same elsewhere: "Don't try to compete with us in Cleveland, or we'll drop prices like we did in Tampa."

These models of successful predation are decades old, and have broad acceptance within economics - outside of Chicago-style ideologues - but they've yet to make much of a dent in minds of the judges who hear Predatory Pricing cases.

While judges continue to hit the snooze-bar on any awakening to this phenomenon, a new kind of predator has emerged, using a new kind of predation: the Venture Predator, a predatory company backed by venture capital funds, who make lots of high-risk bets they must cash out in ten years or less, ideally for a 100x+ return.

Writing in the *Journal of Corporation Law* Matthew Wansley and Samuel Weinstein - both of the Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University - lay out a theory of Venture Predation in clear, irrefutable language, using it to explain the recent bubble we sometimes call the Millennial Lifestyle Subsidy:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4437360

What's a Venture Predator? It's "a startup that uses venture finance to price below its costs, chase its rivals out of the market, and grab market share." The predator sets millions or billions of dollars on fire chasing "rapid, exponential growth" all in order to "create the impression that recoupment is possible" among future investors, such as blue-chip companies that might buy them out, or sucker retail investors who buy in at the IPO, anticipating years of monopoly pricing.

In other words, the Venture Predator constructs a pile of shit so large and impressive that investors are convinced that there must be a pony under there somewhere.

There's another name for this kind of arrangement: a bezzle, which Galbraith described as "the magic interval when a confidence trickster knows he has the money he has appropriated but the victim does not yet understand that he has lost it."

Millennial Lifestyle Subsidy companies are bezzles. Uber, annihilated tens of billions of dollars on its bezzle, destroying the taxi industry and laying waste to public transit investment, demolishing labor protections and convincing people that impossible self-driving robo-taxis were around the coner:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/02/16/ring-ring-lapd-calling/#uber-unter

But while Uber the company lost billions of dollars, Uber's early investors and executives made out like bandits (or predators, I suppose). The founders were able to flog their shares on the secondary market long before the IPO. Same for the early investors, like Benchmark capital.

Since the company's IPO, its finances have steadily worsened, and the company has resorted to increasingly sweaty balance-sheet manipulation tactics and PR offensives to make it seem like a viable business:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/05/a-lousy-taxi/#a-giant-asterisk

But Uber can't ever recoup the billions it spent convincing the market that there was a pony beneath its pile of shit. The app Uber uses to connect riders with the employees it misclassifies as contractors isn't hard to clone, and it's not hard for drivers or riders to switch from one app to another:

https://locusmag.com/2019/01/cory-doctorow-disruption-for-thee-but-not-for-me/

Nor can Uber prevent its rivals from taking advantage of the hundreds of millions of dollars it spent on "regulatory entrepreneurship" - changing the laws to make it easier to misclassify workers and operate unlicensed taxi services.

It's not clear whether Uber ever believed in robo-taxis, or whether they were just part of the bezzle. In any event, Uber's no longer in the robotaxi races: after blowing $2.5B on self-driving cars, Uber produced a vehicle whose mean-distance-between-fatal-crashes was 0.5 miles. Uber had to pay another company $400M to take its self-driving unit off its hands:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/09/herbies-revenge/#100-billion-here-100-billion-there-pretty-soon-youre-talking-real-money

Uber's prices rose 92% between 2018-21, while its driver compensation has plunged. The company is finding it increasingly difficult to passengers into cars, and drivers onto the road. The have invented algorithmic wage disrimination, an exciting new field of labor-law violations, in order to trick drivers into thinking there's a pony under all that shit:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/12/algorithmic-wage-discrimination/#fishers-of-men

To Uber's credit, they have been a wildly innovative company, inventing many new ways to make the pile of shit bigger and the pony more plausible. Back when Uber and Lyft were locked in head-to-head competition, Uber employees created huge pools of fake Lyft rider accounts, using them to set up and tear down rides in order to discover what Lyft was charging for rides in order to underprice them. Uber also covertly operated the microphones in its drivers' phones to listen for the chimes the Lyft app made: drivers who had both Lyft and Uber installed on their devices were targeted for (strictly temporary) bonuses.

Uber won't ever recoup, but that's OK. The investors and execs made vast fortunes. Now, normally, you'd expect company founders and other managers with large piles of stocks in a VC-backed company to be committed to the business's success, at least in the medium term, because their shares can't be liquidated until well after the company goes public.

But the burgeoning "secondary market" for managers' shares has turned investors and managers into co-conspirators in the Venture Predation bezzle: "half of Series A and B deals now have some secondary component for founders." That means that founders can cash out before the bezzle ends.

The trick with any bezzle is to skip town while the mark is still energetically digging through the shit, *before* the pony is revealed for an illusion. That's where crypto comes in: during the cryptocurrency bubble, VCs cashed out of their investments early through Initial Coin Offerings and other forms of securities fraud. The massive returns this generated were well worth the millions they sprinkled on Superbowl ads and bribes for Matt Damon.

But woe betide the VC who mistimes their exit. As Wework showed, it's entirely possible for VCs to be left holding the bag if they get the timing wrong. Wework blew $12b on predatory pricing - promising tenants at rivals' businesses moving bonuses or even a year's free rent, all to make the pile of shit look larger and thus more apt to contain a pony. The company opened its co-working spaces as close as possible to existing shops, oversaturating hot markets and showing "growth" by poaching customers through deep subsidies, then pretending that those customers would stay when the subsidies evaporated. But Wework's "product" was temporary hot-desks, occupied by people who could (and did) move at the drop of a hat.

To its competitors, its competitors' creditors, and credulous investors, it appeared that Wework had developed some kind of "efficiency advantage" - a secret sauce that let it sell a product at a price that was far below its rivals' costs. But once Wework filed for its IPO, its S-1 - the form that discloses the company's finances - revealed the truth. Wework's only "advantage" was the bafflegab of its cult-like leader and the torrent of cash supplied by its VCs.

Wework's IPO was a disaster. After canceling a real IPO, the company eventually went public through a scammy SPAC, saw its shares immediately tank, and continue to fall, as its balance-sheet is still blood-red with losses.

Another Venture Predator is Bird, the company that flooded American cities with cheap, flimsy Chinese scooters, choking curbs and sidewalks. 25% of the gross revenues from *each scooter ride* had to be written off as depreciation on the scooter. As a Bird spokesperson told the *LA Times*: "There are very few unique companies for which you can build global scale really quickly and build a dominant market position
before other people do, and for those rarefied companies scaling quickly matters more than short-term profits."

Bird was another company that could never recoup, whose executives and investors could only cash out if they could maintain the faint hope of the pony underneath its pile of shitty scooters. It drove the company to some genuinely surreal lengths. For example, in 2018, I reported on the existence of a kit that  let you buy an impounded Bird scooter for pennies and retrofit it to run without an app, so you could take it anywhere:

https://boingboing.net/2018/12/08/flipping-a-bird.html

Shortly thereafter, I got a legal threat from Linda Kwak, Bird's Senior Corporate Counsel, claiming that publishing a link to a website that sells you a product you install by unscrewing one board and inserting another was a violation of Section 1201 of the DMCA, which was an *astonishingly* stupid claim:

https://www.eff.org/document/bird-rides-takedown-boing-boing-dec-20-2018

It was also an astonishingly stupid claim to make to *me*, a career activist with 20 years experience fighting DMCA1201, a decades-old professional affiliation with EFF, and a giant megaphone:

https://boingboing.net/2019/01/11/flipping-the-bird.html

But Bird was palpably desperate to keep its bezzle going, and Kwak - an employment lawyer with undeniable deficits in her understanding of copyright and cyber-law - was their champion

Fascinatingly, one thing Bird *didn't* worry about was competition from Uber and Lyft, who piled into the e-scooter market. Bird circulated a (leaked) pitch-deck reassuring investors that Uber/Lyft weren't gunning for them, because they "“won't subsidize prices" as they prepared for their IPOs, which involved disclosing their finances to their investors

Bird's investors either lost money or made small-dollar returns, but they were outfoxed by Bird founder Travis VanderZanden, a superpredator who cashed out $44m in shares  just as the VCs were piling in.

Venture Predation is another stinging rebuttal to the Chicago School's blithe dismissal of Predatory Pricing as an illusion. Private firms - of the sort that VCs back - whose boards are made up of founders and VCs who stand to benefit from the pile-of-shit gambit are perfectly capable of spending huge fortunes to make Predatory Pricing work. VCs make a practice of repeatedly co-investing in businesses together, which fosters the kind of trust that allows for these gambits to be played again and again.

For later stage, pony-thirsty investors who get stuck holding the bag, the lure of monopoly profits is both powerful and plausible - after 40 years of antitrust neglect, monopolies are the kinds of things one can both attain and defend (think of Peter Thiel's maxim, "competition is for losers," or Warren Buffett's terrifying priapisms induced by the mere thought of businesses with "wide, sustainable moats").

In a world of Facebook and Google, dreaming of monopolies isn't irrational - it's aspirational.

VCs are ideally poised to play the Venture Predation gambit. They are risk-tolerant and need to cash out over short timescales. What's more, VCs' longstanding boasts of their ability to identify companies who have invented new, super-efficient ways to do boring things like "rent out office space" or "provide taxis" gives the pile-of-shit pony-pitch a plausible ring.

The Venture Predator gambit isn't just a form of plute-on-plute violence in which billionaires fleece millionaires. Like any anticompetitive scam, Venture Predators are able to pick winners in the marketplace - rather than getting the taxi or the office rental service or the scooter that serves you best, you get the scammiest version.

Workers who are roped in by the scam also suffer - the authors raise the example of a cab driver who leases a car to drive for Uber, based on the early subsidies the company offered, only to find themselves unable to make payments once the bezzle ends and Uber starts clawing back the driver's wages.

Then there's the cost to society: during the decade-plus in which Uber was pissing away the Saudi royal family's billions subsidizing rides, cities dismantled their public transit, even as residents made decisions about where to live and work based on the presumption that Uber was charging a fair, sustainable price for rides.

The authors propose a bunch of legislative fixes for this, but warn that none of them are likely to get through Congress or the Manne-pilled judiciary. But they do hold out hope for a proposed SEC rule "requiring large, private companies to make basic financial disclosures." These disclosures would make it impossible for companies to pretend that they had built a better mousetrap when all they had was a bigger pile of shit.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🧜‍♂️ Hey look at this

* Debt Ceiling: What Are þe Fallback Threat Points in þe Case of "No Deal"? https://braddelong.substack.com/p/debt-ceiling-what-are-e-fallback

* ‘Sorry To Bother You’ Director Boots Riley On WGA Strike, Struggle, Solidarity, Sacrifice & AI https://deadline.com/2023/05/wga-strike-boots-riley-guest-column-1235367232/ (h/t Payday Report)

* Today I learned that Church Molestation Liability Insurance is a thing that exists https://www.jwz.org/blog/2023/05/today-i-learned-that-church-molestation-liability-insurance-is-a-thing-that-exists/

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🧜‍♂️ This day in history

#20yrsago Pal Mickey: A location-aware wireless famulus for Walt Disney World https://web.archive.org/web/20030523192116/http://www.wdisneyw.co.uk/palmickey.html

#20yrsago PressPlay being sold to Napster https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/19/business/deal-may-raise-napster-from-online-ashes.html

#15yrsago UK gov’t wants database of every phone call and email https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7409593.stm

#15yrsago Microsoft: we listen to broadcasters, not customers https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/microsofts-masters-whose-rules-does-your-media-cen

#10yrsago What the Mounties pirate https://www.pirateparty.ca/2013/05/17/rcmp-and-industry-canada-ip-addresses-found-to-be-downloading-torrents/

#10yrago Patent lawyers: Help! The evil Makers won’t let us apply for bullshit 3D printing patents! https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/crowdsourcing-prior-art-to-defeat-3d-printing-patent-1.html

#5yrsago An interview with Jordan Peterson, who believes in witches and dragons https://www.somethingawful.com/news/jordan-peterson-interview/

#5yrsago A data-broker has been quietly selling realtime access to your cellphone’s location, and they suck, so anyone could get it for free https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/05/tracking-firm-locationsmart-leaked-location-data-for-customers-of-all-major-u-s-mobile-carriers-in-real-time-via-its-web-site/

#1yrago The impossible scam of US drug plans https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/19/the-weakest-link/#they-screw-you-at-the-pharmacy

#1yrago Your mom is a tech ninja https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/19/the-weakest-link/#moms-are-ninjas

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🧜‍♂️ Colophon

Today's top sources: Dan Gillmor (https://mastodon.social/@dangillmor).

Currently writing:

* A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING

* Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

* The Bezzle, a Martin Hench noir thriller novel about the prison-tech industry. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW

* Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. ON SUBMISSION

* Moral Hazard, a short story for MIT Tech Review's 12 Tomorrows. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION

* Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. ON SUBMISSION

Latest podcast: The Swivel-Eyed Loons Have a Point https://craphound.com/news/2023/05/14/the-swivel-eyed-loons-have-a-point/

Upcoming appearances:

* Gaithersburg Book Festival, May 20
https://www.gaithersburgbookfestival.org/featured_author/cory-doctorow/

* Public Knowledge Emerging Tech keynote (DC), May 22
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/emerging-tech-tickets-600582126307

* WEPFest with Ron Diebert, Dave Bidini and Nancy Olivieri (Toronto), May 23
https://www.westendphoenix.com/shop/wepfest-spring-fundraiser

* HowTheLightGetsIn (Hay), May 28
https://howthelightgetsin.org/events/the-ai-enigma-12147

* HowTheLightGetsIn (Hay), May 29
https://howthelightgetsin.org/events/the-danger-and-desire-of-the-frontier-12246

* Red Team Blues event with Tim Harford (Oxford), May 29
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cory-doctorow-red-team-blues-with-tim-harford-tickets-574673793787

* Red Team Blues event with Christian Reilly (Nottingham), May 30
https://www.waterstones.com/events/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow/nottingham

* Red Team Blues event with Ian Forrester (Manchester), May 31
https://www.waterstones.com/events/in-conversation-with-cory-doctorow/manchester-deansgate

* UCL Peter Kirstein Lecture, Jun 1 (London):
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/peter-kirstein-lecture-2023-featuring-cory-doctorow-registration-539205788027

* Cymera Festival, Jun 3 (Edinburgh)
https://www.cymerafestival.co.uk/cymera23-events/2023/4/4/connection-interrupted-with-nina-allan-cory-doctorow-and-ian-mcdonald

* Red Team Blues with Martha Lane Fox at the British Library, Jun 5 (London):
https://www.bl.uk/events/an-evening-with-cory-doctorow-techno-thriller

* Re:publica keynote, Jun 7 (Berlin)
https://re-publica.com/de/news/rp23-keynote-von-cory-doctorow-rebecca-giblin-kreative-arbeitsmaerkte-und-monopole

* Otherland event for Red Team Blues, Jun 8 (Berlin)
https://www.otherland-berlin.de/de/event-details/cory-doctorow-autorenabend.html

Recent appearances:

* Crime and Crypto | CYBER (Vice Motherboard)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvRhj9zomKw

* Shakedowns, Shell Games & Other Silicon Valley Shenanigans (MMT Podcast)
https://pileusmmt.libsyn.com/170-cory-doctorow-shakedowns-shell-games-other-silicon-valley-shenanigans

* Chokepoint Capitalism's Stranglehold on the Arts (News Beat)
https://radiopublic.com/news-beat-GKkdOB/s1!ded55

Latest books:

* "Red Team Blues": "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books http://redteamblues.com

* "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com

* "Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone technothriller for adults. The *Washington Post* called it "a political cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html

* "How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a solution. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59 (print edition: https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907) (signed copies: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)

* "Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new introduction by Edward Snowden: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html

* "Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Order here: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed copy here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2682/Corey_Doctorow%3A_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer_HB.html#/.

Upcoming books:

* The Internet Con: A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech, Verso, September 2023

* The Lost Cause: a post-Green New Deal eco-topian novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias, Tor Books, November 2023

This work - excluding any serialized fiction - is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.

_,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,__,.-'~'-.,_

🧜‍♂️ How to get Pluralistic:

Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

Pluralistic.net

Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://pluralistic.net/plura-list

Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):

https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic

Medium (no ads, paywalled):

https://doctorow.medium.com/

(Latest Medium column: "Google's AI Hype Circle: We have to do Bard because everyone else is doing AI; everyone else is doing AI because we're doing Bard" https://doctorow.medium.com/googles-ai-hype-circle-6158804d1299)

Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://twitter.com/doctorow

Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):

https://mostlysignssomeportents.tumblr.com/tagged/pluralistic

"*When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla*" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla